3.8 Article

Key Points of Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) for Wastewater, Organic Pollutants and Pharmaceutical Waste Treatment: A Mini Review

Journal

CHEMENGINEERING
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/chemengineering6010008

Keywords

advanced oxidation process; wastewater; green chemistry; waste management; sonochemistry

Funding

  1. National Technical University of Athens (Greece)
  2. Clausthal University of Technology (Germany)
  3. Open University of Cyprus
  4. European Union [870292]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces the basic mechanism and classification of advanced oxidation procedures (AOPs), and analyzes the reactive species and advantages of each AOP. Finally, the implementation of combined AOPs is considered as an effective solution to address global environmental waste management issues.
Advanced oxidation procedures (AOPs) refer to a variety of technical procedures that produce OH radicals to sufficiently oxidize wastewater, organic pollutant streams, and toxic effluents from industrial, hospital, pharmaceutical and municipal wastes. Through the implementation of such procedures, the (post) treatment of such waste effluents leads to products that are more susceptible to bioremediation, are less toxic and possess less pollutant load. The basic mechanism produces free OH radicals and other reactive species such as superoxide anions, hydrogen peroxide, etc. A basic classification of AOPs is presented in this short review, analyzing the processes of UV/H2O2, Fenton and photo-Fenton, ozone-based (O-3) processes, photocatalysis and sonolysis from chemical and equipment points of view to clarify the nature of the reactive species in each AOP and their advantages. Finally, combined AOP implementations are favored through the literature as an efficient solution in addressing the issue of global environmental waste management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available