4.5 Article

Hybrid Machine Learning Model for Face Recognition Using SVM

Journal

CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages 2697-2712

Publisher

TECH SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.32604/cmc.2022.023052

Keywords

Face recognition system (FRS); face identification; SVM; discrete cosine transform (DCT); artificial neural network (ANN); machine learning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Face recognition systems have improved human-computer interactions, with PCA-SVM showing better generalization capabilities and avoiding overfitting compared to PCA-ANN. However, PCA-SVM is ineffective in cases of poor lighting, long hair, or items covering the face. This study proposes a novel PCA-SVM-based model to overcome PCA-ANN's recognition issues and enhance face detection.
Face recognition systems have enhanced human-computer interac-tions in the last ten years. However, the literature reveals that current tech-niques used for identifying or verifying faces are not immune to limitations. Principal Component Analysis-Support Vector Machine (PCA-SVM) and Principal Component Analysis-Artificial Neural Network (PCA-ANN) are among the relatively recent and powerful face analysis techniques. Compared to PCA-ANN, PCA-SVM has demonstrated generalization capabilities in many tasks, including the ability to recognize objects with small or large data samples. Apart from requiring a minimal number of parameters in face detection, PCA-SVM minimizes generalization errors and avoids overfitting problems better than PCA-ANN. PCA-SVM, however, is ineffective and inef-ficient in detecting human faces in cases in which there is poor lighting, long hair, or items covering the subject's face. This study proposes a novel PCA-SVM-based model to overcome the recognition problem of PCA-ANN and enhance face detection. The experimental results indicate that the proposed model provides a better face recognition outcome than PCA-SVM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available