Journal
AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 695-714Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40520-022-02100-4
Keywords
Osteoporosis; Epidemiology; Imminent; Fracture; Anabolic; Antiresorptive
Categories
Funding
- ESCEO
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Osteoporosis care has evolved significantly, with established clinical definitions, validated fracture risk assessment methods, and effective pharmacological agents. Anabolic agents have shown to be more rapid and efficacious in reducing fracture risk compared to antiresorptive therapies. Expert recommendations support an initial intervention with anabolic agents for high-risk fracture patients, followed by maintenance therapy using antiresorptive agents and long-term osteoporosis treatment.
Osteoporosis care has evolved markedly over the last 50 years, such that there are now an established clinical definition, validated methods of fracture risk assessment and a range of effective pharmacological agents. Currently, bone-forming (anabolic) agents, in many countries, are used in those patients who have continued to lose bone mineral density (BMD), patients with multiple subsequent fractures or those who have fractured despite treatment with antiresorptive agents. However, head-to-head data suggest that anabolic agents have greater rapidity and efficacy for fracture risk reduction than do antiresorptive therapies. The European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) convened an expert working group to discuss the tools available to identify patients at high risk of fracture, review the evidence for the use of anabolic agents as the initial intervention in patients at highest risk of fracture and consider the sequence of therapy following their use. This position paper sets out the findings of the group and the consequent recommendations. The key conclusion is that the current evidence base supports an anabolic first approach in patients found to be at very high risk of fracture, followed by maintenance therapy using an antiresorptive agent, and with the subsequent need for antiosteoporosis therapy addressed over a lifetime horizon.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available