4.1 Review

Applications of Machine Learning to Wind Engineering

Journal

FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbuil.2022.811460

Keywords

machine learning; wind engineering; wind climate; terrain and topography; aerodynamics and aeroelasticity; structural dynamics; wind damage assessment; hazard mitigation and response

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review examines the state of research and practice of machine learning (ML) applications in wind engineering, providing a comprehensive summary of its utilization in various topic areas and identifying critical challenges and prospects for future research efforts.
Advances of the analytical, numerical, experimental and field-measurement approaches in wind engineering offers unprecedented volume of data that, together with rapidly evolving learning algorithms and high-performance computational hardware, provide an opportunity for the community to embrace and harness full potential of machine learning (ML). This contribution examines the state of research and practice of ML for its applications to wind engineering. In addition to ML applications to wind climate, terrain/topography, aerodynamics/aeroelasticity and structural dynamics (following traditional Alan G. Davenport Wind Loading Chain), the review also extends to cover wind damage assessment and wind-related hazard mitigation and response (considering emerging performance-based and resilience-based wind design methodologies). This state-of-the-art review suggests to what extend ML has been utilized in each of these topic areas within wind engineering and provides a comprehensive summary to improve understanding how learning algorithms work and when these schemes succeed or fail. Moreover, critical challenges and prospects of ML applications in wind engineering are identified to facilitate future research efforts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available