4.5 Article

Social dynamics and individual hunting tactics of white sharks revealed by biologging

Journal

BIOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2021.0599

Keywords

inter-animal telemetry; social associations; accelerometers; social foraging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study measures the social associations and behavior of white sharks using biologging sensors. The results suggest that white sharks form both random and stronger associations with other individuals. The sharks also exhibit individual variability in depth usage and activity, potentially indicating a desire to share information about prey.
Social foraging, where animals forage in groups, takes many forms but is less studied in marine predators as measuring social associations in the wild is challenging. We used biologging (activity, cameras and telemetry receivers) sensors to measure social associations and simultaneous behaviour, in white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) off Guadalupe Island, Mexico. Animal-borne telemetry receivers revealed that sharks varied in the number of associations they formed and occurred most often when sharks were swimming in straight paths or when they were turning frequently. While many associations were likely random, there was evidence of some stronger associations. Sharks varied in the depths they used and their activity, with some individuals more active in shallow water while others were more active 200-300 m deep. We propose that white sharks associate with other individuals so they can inadvertently share information on the location or remains of large prey. However, there may be a wide range of individual variability in both behaviour and sociality. Biologging now enables social associations of animals to be measured, concurrent with measures of their behaviour, so that social foraging of large marine predators can be quantified in the wild.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available