4.1 Review

Injectable hydrogels for bone and cartilage tissue engineering: a review

Journal

PROGRESS IN BIOMATERIALS
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 113-135

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40204-022-00185-8

Keywords

In situ injectable hydrogels; Injectable microparticles; Injectable shape memory scaffolds; Bone tissue engineering; Cartilage tissue engineering

Funding

  1. National Institute for Medical Research Development (NIMAD)
  2. National Institute for Medical Research Development (NIMAD) [942955]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tissue engineering, using a combination of living cells, bioactive molecules, and three-dimensional porous scaffolds, is a promising alternative to traditional treatments. Injectable scaffolds have advantages such as minimally invasive application, strong plasticity, and homogeneous cell distribution, making them widely used in bone and cartilage tissue regeneration.
Tissue engineering, using a combination of living cells, bioactive molecules, and three-dimensional porous scaffolds, is a promising alternative to traditional treatments such as the use of autografts and allografts for bone and cartilage tissue regeneration. Scaffolds, in this combination, can be applied either through surgery by implantation of cell-seeded pre-fabricated scaffolds, or through injection of a solidifying precursor and cell mixture, or as an injectable cell-seeded pre-fabricated scaffold. In situ forming and pre-fabricated injectable scaffolds can be injected directly into the defect site with complex shape and critical size in a minimally invasive manner. Proper and homogeneous distribution of cells, biological factors, and molecular signals in these injectable scaffolds is another advantage over pre-fabricated scaffolds. Due to the importance of injectable scaffolds in tissue engineering, here different types of injectable scaffolds, their design challenges, and applications in bone and cartilage tissue regeneration are reviewed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available