4.5 Review

Ice Accretion on Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-A Review Study

Journal

DRONES
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/drones6040086

Keywords

atmospheric icing; UAV; LWC; MVD; Reynolds number; aerodynamic penalties; IPS; modal analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. UiT- The Arctic University of Norway [7400-72104]
  2. nICE project of UiT & Research Council of Norway [324156]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper provides a comprehensive review of ice accretion on fixed-wing UAVs, including various methodologies for studying and comprehending the physics of ice accretion, the impact of various environmental and geometric factors on ice accretion, and the pros and cons of various ice detection and mitigation techniques developed for UAVs.
Ice accretion on commercial aircraft operating at high Reynolds numbers has been extensively studied in the literature, but a direct transformation of these results to an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) operating at low Reynolds numbers is not straightforward. Changes in Reynolds number have a significant impact on the ice accretion physics. Previously, only a few researchers worked in this area, but it is now gaining more attention due to the increasing applications of UAVs in the modern world. As a result, an attempt is made to review existing scientific knowledge and identify the knowledge gaps in this field of research. Ice accretion can deteriorate the aerodynamic performance, structural integrity, and aircraft stability, necessitating optimal ice mitigation techniques. This paper provides a comprehensive review of ice accretion on fixed-wing UAVs. It includes various methodologies for studying and comprehending the physics of ice accretion on UAVs. The impact of various environmental and geometric factors on ice accretion physics is reviewed, and knowledge gaps are identified. The pros and cons of various ice detection and mitigation techniques developed for UAVs are also discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available