4.5 Article

A newly reconciled dataset for identifying sea level rise and variability in Dublin Bay

Journal

OCEAN SCIENCE
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 511-522

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/os-18-511-2022

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Science Foundation Ireland Investigator Award [16/IA/4520]
  2. Science Foundation Ireland [17/CDA/4695]
  3. Marine Institute
  4. Marine Research Programme 2014-2020 through the A4 project [PBA/18/CC/01]
  5. [12/RC/2289-P2]
  6. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [16/IA/4520] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents an updated sea level dataset for Dublin from 1938 to 2016, with calibration using nearby tide gauges. The results show that the sea level rise in Dublin over the past decades is consistent with expected trends, but recent years have experienced higher rates of rise due to large multidecadal variability.
We provide an updated sea level dataset for Dublin for the period 1938-2016 at yearly resolution. Using a newly collated sea level record for Dublin Port, as well as two nearby tide gauges at Arklow and Howth Harbour, we perform data quality checks and calibration of the Dublin Port record by adjusting the biased high water level measurements that affect the overall calculation of mean sea level (MSL). To correct these MSL values, we use a novel Bayesian linear regression that includes the mean low water values as a predictor in the model. We validate the re-created MSL dataset and show its consistency with other nearby tide gauge datasets. Using our new corrected dataset, we estimate a rate of sea level rise of 1.1 mm yr(-1) during 1953-2016 (95 % credible interval from 0.6 to 1.6 mm yr(-1)), and a rate of 7 mm yr(-1) during 1997-2016 (95 % credible interval from 5 to 8.8 mm yr(-1)). The overall sea level rise is in line with expected trends, but large multidecadal variability has led to higher rates of rise in recent years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available