4.6 Review

Point-of-care viral load tests to detect high HIV viral load in people living with HIV/AIDS attending health facilities

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013208.pub2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. World Health Organization (WHO), Switzerland
  2. WHO
  3. Foreign, Commonwealth & Development OFice (FCDO), UK [300342-104]
  4. UK MRC, UK
  5. UK MRC African Research Leaders award [MR/T008768/1]
  6. UK Medical Research Council (MRC)
  7. UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development OFice (FCDO) under the MRC/FCDO Concordat agreement
  8. European Union

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care (POC) tests in detecting high viral load levels in people living with HIV (PLHIV). The results showed that POC tests have high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing high HIV viral load in PLHIV attending healthcare facilities at a clinical threshold of >= 1000 copies/mL.
Background Viral load (VL) testing in people living with HIV (PLHIV) helps to monitor antiretroviral therapy (ART). VL is still largely tested using central laboratory-based platforms, which have long test turnaround times and involve sophisticated equipment. VL tests with point-of-care (POC) platforms capable of being used near the patient are potentially easy to use, give quick results, are cost-effective, and could replace central or reference VL testing platforms. Objectives To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of POC tests to detect high viral load levels in PLHIV attending healthcare facilities. Search methods We searched eight electronic databases using standard, extensive Cochrane search methods, and did not use any language, document type, or publication status limitations. We also searched the reference lists of included studies and relevant systematic reviews, and consulted an expert in the field from the World Health Organization (WHO) HIV Department for potentially relevant studies. The latest search was 23 November 2020. Selection criteria We included any primary study that compared the results of a VL test with a POC platform to that of a central laboratory-based reference test to detect high viral load in PLHIV on HIV/AIDS care or follow-up. We included all forms of POC tests for VL as defined by study authors, regardless of the healthcare facility in which the test was conducted. We excluded diagnostic case-control studies with healthy controls and studies that did not provide sufficient data to create the 2 x 2 tables to calculate sensitivity and specificity. We did not limit our study inclusion to age, gender, or geographical setting. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently screened the titles, abstracts, and full texts of the search results to identify eligible articles. They also independently extracted data using a standardized data extraction form and conducted risk of bias assessment using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Using participants as the unit of analysis, we fitted simplified univariable models for sensitivity and specificity separately, employing a random-effects model to estimate the summary sensitivity and specificity at the current and commonly reported World Health Organization (WHO) threshold (>= 1000 copies/mL). The bivariate models did not converge to give a model estimate. Main results We identified 18 studies (24 evaluations, 10,034 participants) defining high viral loads at main thresholds >= 1000 copies/mL (n = 20), >= 5000 copies/mL (n = 1), and >= 40 copies/mL (n = 3). All evaluations were done on samples from PLHIV retrieved from routine HIV/AIDS care centres or health facilities. For clinical applicability, we included 14 studies (20 evaluations, 8659 participants) assessing high viral load at the clinical threshold of >= 1000 copies/mL in the meta-analyses. Of these, sub-Saharan Africa, Europe, and Asia contributed 16, three, and one evaluation respectively. All included participants were on ART in only nine evaluations; in the other 11 evaluations the proportion of participants on ART was either partial or not clearly stated. Thirteen evaluations included adults only (n = 13), five mixed populations of adults and children, whilst in the remaining two the age of included populations was not clearly stated. The majority of evaluations included commercially available tests (n = 18). Ten evaluations were POC VL tests conducted near the patient in a peripheral or onsite laboratory, whilst the other 10 were evaluations of POC VL tests in a central or reference laboratory setting. The test types evaluated as POC VL tests included Xpert HIV-1 Viral Load test (n = 8), SAMBA HIV-1 Semi-Q Test (n = 9), Alere Q NAT prototype assay for HIV-1 (n = 2) and m-PIMA HIV-1/2 Viral Load test (n = 1). The majority of evaluations (n = 17) used plasma samples, whilst the rest (n = 3) utilized whole blood samples. Pooled sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI)) of POC VL at a threshold of >= 1000 copies/mL was 96.6% (94.8 to 97.8) (20 evaluations, 2522 participants), and pooled specificity (95% CI) was 95.7% (90.8 to 98.0) (20 evaluations, 6137 participants). Median prevalence for high viral load (>= 1000 copies/mL) (n = 20) was 33.4% (range 6.9% to 88.5%). Limitations The risk of bias was mostly assessed as unclear across the four domains due to incomplete reporting. Authors' conclusions We found POC VL to have high sensitivity and high specificity for the diagnosis of high HIV viral load in PLHIV attending healthcare facilities at a clinical threshold of >= 1000 copies/mL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available