Journal
BREAST CANCER-BASIC AND CLINICAL RESEARCH
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/11782234221089597
Keywords
Breast cancer; breast reconstruction; implant-based reconstruction; latissimus dorsi flap; deep inferior epigastric perforator; autologous breast reconstruction
Categories
Funding
- Geneva Cancer League
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study compared the patient satisfaction and objective outcomes of three common breast reconstruction techniques. The results showed that DIEP reconstruction obtained higher scores in terms of aesthetic outcome, immediate reconstruction impact, and overall satisfaction. Implant-based reconstruction had the best results in the somatosensory evaluation. The study suggests that despite its complexity, DIEP reconstruction is the most satisfactory and best experienced method for patients.
BACKGROUND: An increasing number of breast cancer patients undergo immediate or secondary breast reconstruction, but the ideal method in terms of patient satisfaction remains ambiguous. We compared the 3 most common breast reconstruction techniques to determine patient satisfaction and objective outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective study of 184 patients with breast cancer who underwent a reconstructive procedure between 1993 and 2011 at our institution. Procedures evaluated were implant-based reconstruction (IBR) alone, latissimus dorsi (LD) flap reconstruction with/without implant. and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap reconstruction. A retrospective patient satisfaction questionnaire was sent to all women. Twenty patients from each subgroup were matched to conduct a standardized objective assessment of the sensitivity of their reconstructed breast. A blinded photographic evaluation was also performed by 3 independent observers to assess the esthetic aspect and symmetry. RESULTS: DIEP obtained significantly higher average scores regarding the esthetic outcome, immediate reconstruction impact. and overall score in the questionnaire evaluation. The IBR had the best results in the somatosensory evaluation, with DIEP scoring better than LD. DIEP received higher scores on average than LD for the criteria of size and symmetry in the esthetic evaluation. No statistically significant differences were observed between IBR and DIEP. CONCLUSIONS: Good results were reported overall for all breast reconstruction procedures. with more reserved scores for LD. The DIEP reconstruction appeared to be the most satisfactory and best experienced reconstruction method for patients, despite the complexity of the intervention. Clinicians should be encouraged to consider DIEP as the principal choice for breast reconstruction.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available