4.5 Article

Inward diffusion and loss of radiation belt protons

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS
Volume 121, Issue 3, Pages 1969-1978

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015JA022154

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA [NNH14AX18I]
  2. Air Force Research Laboratory under the Heliophysics Guest Investigators Program, at University of Colorado and Dartmouth College by RBSP-ECT through JHU/APL contract under prime NASA [967399, NAS5-01072]
  3. Air Force Research Laboratory under the Heliophysics Guest Investigators Program, Dartmouth College, by NASA grant [NNX15AF54G]
  4. National Science Foundation [AGS-1455470]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Radiation belt protons in the kinetic energy range 24 to 76 MeV are being measured by the Relativistic Electron Proton Telescope on each of the two Van Allen Probes. Data have been processed for the purpose of studying variability in the trapped proton intensity during October 2013 to August 2015. For the lower energies (less than or similar to 32 MeV), equatorial proton intensity near L = 2 showed a steady increase that is consistent with inward diffusion of trapped solar protons, as shown by positive radial gradients in phase space density at fixed values of the first two adiabatic invariants. It is postulated that these protons were trapped with enhanced efficiency during the 7 March 2012 solar proton event. A model that includes radial diffusion, along with known trapped proton source and loss processes, shows that the observed average rate of increase near L = 2 is predicted by the same model diffusion coefficient that is required to form the entire proton radiation belt, down to low L, over an extended (similar to 10(3) year) interval. A slower intensity decrease for lower energies near L = 1.5 may also be caused by inward diffusion, though it is faster than predicted by the model. Higher-energy (greater than or similar to 40 MeV) protons near the L = 1.5 intensity maximum are from cosmic ray albedo neutron decay. Their observed intensity is lower than expected by a factor similar to 2, but the discrepancy is resolved by adding an unspecified loss process to the model with a mean lifetime similar to 120 years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available