4.5 Article

Factors affecting the geoeffectiveness of shocks and sheaths at 1 AU

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS
Volume 121, Issue 11, Pages 10861-10879

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2016JA023100

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JHU/APL contract under NASA's Prime contract [967399, NAS5-01072]
  2. [NSFAGS-1433213]
  3. [AGS-1435785]
  4. [NASANNX13AH94G]
  5. [NNX15AB87G]
  6. [NNXNNX16AO04G]
  7. [NNX13AP39G]
  8. Directorate For Geosciences
  9. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [1433213] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  11. Directorate For Geosciences [1435785] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We identify all fast-mode forward shocks, whose sheath regions resulted in a moderate (56 cases) or intense (38 cases) geomagnetic storm during 18.5 years from January 1997 to June 2015. We study their main properties, interplanetary causes, and geoeffects. We find that half (49/94) such shocks are associated with interacting coronal mass ejections (CMEs), as they are either shocks propagating into a preceding CME (35 cases) or a shock propagating into the sheath region of a preceding shock (14 cases). About half (22/45) of the shocks driven by isolated transients and which have geoeffective sheaths compress preexisting southward B-z. Most of the remaining sheaths appear to have planar structures with southward magnetic fields, including some with planar structures consistent with field line draping ahead of the magnetic ejecta. A typical (median) geoeffective shock-sheath structure drives a geomagnetic storm with peak Dst of -88 nT pushes the subsolar magnetopause location to 6.3 RE, i.e., below geosynchronous orbit and is associated with substorms with a peak AL index of -1350 nT. There are some important differences between sheaths associated with CME-CME interaction (stronger storms) and those associated with isolated CMEs (stronger compression of the magnetosphere). We detail six case studies of different types of geoeffective shock-sheaths, as well as two events for which there was no geomagnetic storm but other magnetospheric effects. Finally, we discuss our results in terms of space weather forecasting and potential effects on Earth's radiation belts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available