4.5 Article

A hybrid similarity measure method for patent portfolio analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 1108-1130

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2016.09.006

Keywords

Patent analysis; Similarity measure; Text mining; Bibliometrics

Funding

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2014AA015105]
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP140101366]
  3. National Science Foundation of China Yong Funds [71103015]
  4. Basic Research Foundation of Beijing Institute of Technology [20152142010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Similarity measures are fundamental tools for identifying relationships within or across patent portfolios. Many bibliometric indicators are used to determine similarity measures; for example, bibliographic coupling, citation and co-citation, and co-word distribution. This paper aims to construct a hybrid similarity measure method based on multiple indicators to analyze patent portfolios. Two models are proposed: categorical similarity and semantic similarity. The categorical similarity model emphasizes international patent classifications (IPCs), while the semantic similarity model emphasizes textual elements. We introduce fuzzy set routines to translate the rough technical (sub-) categories of IPCs into defined numeric values, and we calculate the categorical similarities between patent portfolios using membership grade vectors. In parallel, we identify and highlight core terms in a 3 level tree structure and compute the semantic similarities by comparing the tree-based structures. A weighting model is designed to consider: 1) the bias that exists between the categorical and semantic similarities, and 2) the weighting or integrating strategy for a hybrid method. A case study to measure the technological similarities between selected firms in China's medical device industry is used to demonstrate the reliability our method, and the results indicate the practical meaning of our method in a broad range of informetric applications. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available