4.5 Article

Mesoporous Tungsten Trioxide Polyaniline Nanocomposite as an Anode Material for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries

Journal

CHEMNANOMAT
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages 281-289

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cnma.201500208

Keywords

lithium-ion batteries; mesoporous materials; polyaniline; tungsten trioxide

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DMR 1505902]
  2. China Scholarship Council
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [U1401248]
  5. Science and Technology in Guangdong Province [2012A090300012]
  6. Division Of Materials Research
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1505902] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A nanocomposite of polyaniline (PANI)/mesoporous tungsten trioxide (m-WO3) was synthesized by the chemical oxidation polymerization of aniline coated onto an ordered m-WO3 and investigated as an anode material for lithium-ion batteries. The nanocomposite was characterized by using X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. The electrochemical properties of the nanocomposite were evaluated by cyclic voltammetry and constant current charge/discharge tests. The reversible capacity of the PANI/m-WO3 in the first cycle was 1064 mAhg(-1) at 60 mAg(-1) and remained at 803 mAhg(-1) at 180 mAg(-1) after 100 cycles, while the initial charge capacity of m-WO3 was 556 mAhg(-1) and remained only at 303 mAhg(-1) after 50 cycles. The improved electrochemical performance of the nanocomposite can be ascribed to the electronical conductivity of PANI and the chemical interaction between PANI and m-WO3. More importantly, the unique PANI coating layer on the m-WO3 is believed to play an important role in the capacity contribution of the composite.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available