4.6 Article

The reaction between HgBr and O3: kinetic study and atmospheric implications

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 24, Issue 20, Pages 12419-12432

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cp00754a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. State Agency for Research of the Spanish MCINN through the Center of Excellence Severo Ochoa award [SEV-2017-0709]
  2. Ramon y Cajal Program [RYC-2016-19570]
  3. European Research Council Executive Agency under the European Union [ERC-2016-COG 726349]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rate constants of many reactions in atmospheric chemistry of mercury are still unknown. This study conducted the first experimental determination of the rate constant of the gas-phase reaction between the HgBr radical and ozone, as well as the rate constants of two reduction side reactions. The results support the notion that the main atmospheric fate of HgBr is reaction with ozone to form BrHgO.
The rate constants of many reactions currently considered to be important in the atmospheric chemistry of mercury remain to be measured in the laboratory. Here we report the first experimental determination of the rate constant of the gas-phase reaction between the HgBr radical and ozone, for which a value at room temperature of k(HgBr + O-3) = (7.5 +/- 0.6) x 10(-11) cm(3) molecule s(-1) (1 sigma) has been obtained. The rate constants of two reduction side reactions were concurrently determined: k(HgBr + O) = (5.3 +/- 0.4) x 10(-11) cm(3) molecule s(-1) and k(HgBrO + O) = (9.1 +/- 0.6) x 10(-11) cm(3) molecule s(-1). The value of k(HgBr + O-3) is slightly lower than the collision number, confirming the absence of a significant energy barrier. Considering the abundance of ozone in the troposphere, our experimental rate constant supports recent modelling results suggesting that the main atmospheric fate of HgBr is reaction with ozone to form BrHgO.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available