Manual fetal stimulation during intrapartum fetal surveillance: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Manual fetal stimulation, either by mechanical manipulation or by stimulation of the fetal scalp, is known to evoke a fetal heart response in a normal fetus. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness of manual fetal stimulation in the assessment of fetal well-being during labor vs no stimulation among women with a singleton pregnancy and to investigate the maternal and neonatal outcomes in the 2 groups. STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized controlled trial conducted in the department of obstetrics and gynecology at a tertiary care teaching hospital between 2014 and 2016. The inclusion criteria included women with a singleton pregnancy at >= 37 weeks of gestation with cephalic presentation in labor having one of the following abnormalities on fetal heart tracing: fetal heart rate of <110 bpm or >160 bpm, variable decelerations, late decelerations, and minimal or absent beatto-beat variability. The exclusion criteria included women requiring immediate cesarean delivery, conditions that would preclude a vaginal delivery, and intrauterine fetal demise or a major fetal congenital abnormality. The women were followed up in labor and randomized to either the manual stimulation group or the no stimulation group when one of the cardiotocography abnormalities were present. In the manual stimulation group, the fetus was stimulated abdominally by holding the head in the palm of 1 hand when the cervical dilatation was <3 cm or vaginally by pinching the scalp of the fetus when the cervical dilatation was >= 3 cm. After delivery, a cord blood sample was collected and pH estimated. Mother and baby were followed up until discharge, and mode of delivery, cord blood pH at birth, Apgar scores at 1 minute and 5 minutes, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, and duration of stay were the outcomes studied. Data were entered and compiled as frequency and percentage for categorical variables. For continuous variables, data were calculated using mean and standard deviation. The chi-square test was used for assessing the association between the intervention and fetal and maternal outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 327 women were included in the trial, of whom 164 were in the manual fetal stimulation group (group 1) and 163 were in the no stimulation group (group 2). The cesarean delivery rates were 25.61% in group 1 and 30.67% in group 2 (P=.308). The mean cord blood pH levels at birth were 7.267 +/- 0.027 in group 1 and 7.265 +/- 0.024 in group 2 (P=.479), and the Apgar scores at 1 minute and 5 minutes (P=.169 and P=.423, respectively, between the 2 groups) were not found to be statistically different among the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: There was no considerable change in fetomaternal outcomes with manual fetal stimulation in women having nonreassuring cardiotocographic changes in labor.

Automated summary

This study compared the clinical effectiveness of manual fetal stimulation with no stimulation during labor in women with non-reassuring cardiotocographic changes. The results showed that manual fetal stimulation did not have a significant impact on fetomaternal outcomes.