4.7 Article

A derivative-free optimisation method for global ocean biogeochemical models

Journal

GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages 3537-3554

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-15-3537-2022

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Environmental Research Council [NE/L002612/1]
  2. Oxford Doctoral Training Partnership in Environmental Research
  3. Met Office
  4. UK NERC [NE/L012146/1, NE/M020835/1, NE/P019218/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article investigates the performance of an optimization algorithm called DFO-LS in the calibration of global ocean biogeochemical models. The results show that DFO-LS can successfully calibrate the parameters of the model with fewer evaluations compared to another algorithm, CMA-ES. Additionally, DFO-LS is shown to be robust and efficient in the presence of observational sparsity and uncertainty. These findings suggest that DFO-LS is a suitable method for calibrating complex global ocean biogeochemical models.
The skill of global ocean biogeochemical models, and the earth system models in which they are embedded, can be improved by systematic calibration of the parameter values against observations. However, such tuning is seldom undertaken as these models are computationally very expensive. Here we investigate the performance of DFO-LS, a local, derivative-free optimisation algorithm which has been designed for computationally expensive models with irregular model-data misfit landscapes typical of biogeochemical models. We use DFO-LS to calibrate six parameters of a relatively complex global ocean biogeochemical model (MOPS) against synthetic dissolved oxygen, phosphate and nitrate observations from a reference run of the same model with a known parameter configuration. The performance of DFO-LS is compared with that of CMA-ES, another derivative-free algorithm that was applied in a previous study to the same model in one of the first successful attempts at calibrating a global model of this complexity. We find that DFO-LS successfully recovers five of the six parameters in approximately 40 evaluations of the misfit function (each one requiring a 3000-year run of MOPS to equilibrium), while CMA-ES needs over 1200 evaluations. Moreover, DFO-LS reached a baseline misfit, defined by observational noise, in just 11-14 evaluations, whereas CMA-ES required approximately 340 evaluations. We also find that the performance of DFO-LS is not significantly affected by observational sparsity, however fewer parameters were successfully optimised in the presence of observational uncertainty. The results presented here suggest that DFO-LS is sufficiently inexpensive and robust to apply to the calibration of complex, global ocean biogeochemical models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available