4.6 Article

The effect of BeO on heat transfer and durability of nano-CaO-based CO2 adsorbents

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 12, Issue 20, Pages 12647-12654

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ra09250b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21276234]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research focuses on improving the efficiency and durability of CO2 capture in calcium looping technology by doping the adsorbent with high thermal conductivity BeO. The results show that the addition of 15.6wt% BeO in nano-CaO-BeO/Al2O3 adsorbent enhances the decomposition rate, lowers the regeneration temperature, and increases the carbonation conversion rate in infinite cycles.
The solution of decreasing the decomposition temperature of CaCO3 and the development of the durability of the CaO-based CO2 adsorbent are the key issues in reducing the energy consumption and cost of CO2 capture in calcium looping technology. In this work, BeO with high thermal conductivity was chosen as a dopant of the adsorbent to increase the thermal conductivity properties and decomposition properties of CaCO3. The endothermic rate of the nano-CaO-BeO/Al2O3 adsorbent with 15.6 wt% BeO dopant increased by 12.3% compared with that of the nano-CaO/Al2O3 adsorbent at 720 degrees C, leading to an increase of 10.1% of CaCO3 decomposition rate. The enhancement of the decomposition rate of the nano-CaO-BeO/Al2O3 adsorbent was significant to lower the regeneration temperature by 50 degrees C compared with that of the nano-CaO/Al2O3 adsorbent under calcium looping conditions, which made the total average deactivation rate decrease by 21.0% and made the total residual stable carbonation conversion increase by 27.0% in infinite calcium looping cycles. Strengthening the heat transfer inside the adsorbent material can effectively decrease the regeneration temperature, so as to improve the sorption durability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available