4.6 Article

Nonlocal response of plasmonic core-shell nanotopologies excited by dipole emitters

Journal

NANOSCALE ADVANCES
Volume 4, Issue 10, Pages 2346-2355

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1na00726b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO) [3E151025, G090017N]
  2. KU Leuven internal research funds [C14/19/083, C24/15/015, IDN/20/014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In light of the emergence of nonclassical effects, a paradigm shift in the conventional macroscopic treatment is required to accurately describe the interaction between light and plasmonic structures with deep-nanometer features. Several nonlocal response models have been introduced, investigating the collective motion of the free electron gas in metals. The study focuses on the dipole-excited core-shell nanoparticle and compares the predictions of different models with those obtained via the classical approach.
In light of the emergence of nonclassical effects, a paradigm shift in the conventional macroscopic treatment is required to accurately describe the interaction between light and plasmonic structures with deep-nanometer features. Towards this end, several nonlocal response models, supplemented by additional boundary conditions, have been introduced, investigating the collective motion of the free electron gas in metals. The study of the dipole-excited core-shell nanoparticle has been performed, by employing the following models: the hard-wall hydrodynamic model; the quantum hydrodynamic model; and the generalized nonlocal optical response. The analysis is conducted by investigating the near and far field characteristics of the emitter-nanoparticle system, while considering the emitter outside and inside the studied topology. It is shown that the above models predict striking spectral features, strongly deviating from the results obtained via the classical approach, for both simple and noble constitutive metals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available