4.2 Article

Evidence-Based Recovery in Soccer - Low-Effort Approaches for Practitioners

Journal

JOURNAL OF HUMAN KINETICS
Volume 82, Issue 1, Pages 75-99

Publisher

SCIENDO
DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2022-0082

Keywords

football; performance; practical interventions; intermittent exercise; strength and conditioning

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reviewed the scientific evidence and practical approaches of recovery strategies for soccer players. Nutrition and rehydration were identified as strategies with the best evidence, while cold-water immersion, compression garments, foam-rolling/massage, and sleep were rated with moderate evidence to enhance recovery. Other strategies should be applied on an individual basis.
Strategies to improve recovery are widely used among soccer players at both amateur and professional levels. Sometimes, however, recovery strategies are ineffective, improperly timed or even harmful to players. This highlights the need to educate practitioners and athletes about the scientific evidence of recovery strategies as well as to provide practical approaches to address this issue. Therefore, recent surveys among soccer athletes and practitioners were reviewed to identify the recovery modalities currently in use. Each strategy was then outlined with its rationale, its physiological mechanisms and the scientific evidence followed by practical approaches to implement the modality. For each intervention, practical and particularly low-effort strategies are provided to ensure that practitioners at all levels are able to implement them. We identified numerous interventions regularly used in soccer, i.e., sleep, rehydration, nutrition, psychological recovery, active recovery, foam-rolling/massage, stretching, cold-water immersion, and compression garments. Nutrition and rehydration were classified with the best evidence, while cold-water immersion, compression garments, foam-rolling/massage and sleep were rated with moderate evidence to enhance recovery. The remaining strategies (active recovery, psychological recovery, stretching) should be applied on an individual basis due to weak evidence observed. Finally, a guide is provided, helping practitioners to decide which intervention to implement. Here, practitioners should rely on the evidence, but also on their own experience and preference of the players.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available