4.7 Article

A survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging on the implementation of breast diffusion-weighted imaging in clinical practice

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 10, Pages 6588-6597

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08833-0

Keywords

Breast neoplasms; Magnetic resonance imaging; Surveys and questionnaires

Funding

  1. NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA008748]
  2. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  3. GE Healthcare Bayer
  4. NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre [BRC-121520014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study surveyed European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) radiologist members to gather data on the clinical use of breast DWI. The results showed that most radiologists use DWI as part of their routine protocol, mainly for lesion characterization and prediction of chemotherapy response. The majority of radiologists use two separate b values and prefer an appraisal value of 800 s/mm(2). Synthetic b values are not commonly used and report integration of qualitative and quantitative DWI data is inconsistent.
Objectives To perform a survey among all European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) radiologist members to gather representative data regarding the clinical use of breast DWI. Methods An online questionnaire was developed by two board-certified radiologists, reviewed by the EUSOBI board and committees, and finally distributed among EUSOBI active and associated (not based in Europe) radiologist members. The questionnaire included 20 questions pertaining to technical preferences (acquisition time, magnet strength, breast coils, number of b values), clinical indications, imaging evaluation, and reporting. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Chi-square test of independence, and Fisher's exact test. Results Of 1411 EUSOBI radiologist members, 275/1411 (19.5%) responded. Most (222/275, 81%) reported using DWI as part of their routine protocol. Common indications for DWI include lesion characterization (using an ADC threshold of 1.2-1.3 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) and prediction of response to chemotherapy. Members most commonly acquire two separate b values (114/217, 53%), with b value = 800 s/mm(2) being the preferred value for appraisal among those acquiring more than two b values (71/171, 42%). Most did not use synthetic b values (169/217, 78%). While most mention hindered diffusion in the MRI report (161/213, 76%), only 142/217 (57%) report ADC values. Conclusion The utilization of DWI in clinical practice among EUSOBI radiologists who responded to the survey is generally in line with international recommendations, with the main application being the differentiation of benign and malignant enhancing lesions, treatment response assessment, and prediction of response to chemotherapy. Report integration of qualitative and quantitative DWI data is not uniform.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available