4.5 Article

Internally drained catchments dominate supraglacial hydrology of the southwest Greenland Ice Sheet

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2016JF003927

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA [NNX14AH93G]
  2. Polar Geospatial Center, University of Minnesota, under NSF PLR [1043681, 1559691]
  3. NASA [NNX14AH93G, 681568] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Internally drained catchments (IDCs) are hydrologic units on the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) surface that collect and drain meltwater through supraglacial stream/river networks to terminal moulins or lakes. Their areas and shapes constrain the volumes and locations of supraglacial meltwater penetration into the ice. We map IDCs of the southwest GrIS by using Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager panchromatic imagery and a moderate-resolution digital elevation model (DEM). In total 919 IDCs are mapped between 400m and 2000m above sea level, together with their associated supraglacial river networks (total length of 21,129 km), supraglacial lakes (436), and terminal moulins (872). A complex yet broadly predictable surface drainage pattern is revealed, with both IDC areas (AIDC, averaging 17.0 +/- 22.8 km(2), range of 0.4-244.9 km(2)) and the optimal DEM depression-filling threshold (A(dep), varying from 0.2 to 1.0 km(2)) generally increasing with ice surface elevation H. Historical air photos suggest possible transferability of the first relationship over space and time. Intersection of IDC boundaries with Modele Atmospherique Regional regional climate model runoff simulations shows > 50% of runoff modeled for elevations > 1600m is not transported downstream to lower elevations, but instead drains to a small number (51 out of 872) of terminal moulins, indicating modest but nontrivial penetration of surface meltwater at high elevations. In sum, IDCs provide a new, fine-scale hydrologic unit for study of GrIS surface hydrologic processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available