4.7 Article

Bosonic algebraic approach applied to the [QQ] [(Q)over-bar(Q)over-bar] tetraquarks

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 105, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.054024

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11875171, 11675071, 11747318]
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation [OIA-1738287, ACI 1713690]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy [DESC0005248]
  4. Southeastern Universities Research Association
  5. China-U.S. Theory Institute for Physics with Exotic Nuclei (CUSTIPEN) [DESC0009971]
  6. LSU-LNNU joint research program [9961]
  7. Ministerio Espanol deCiencia e Innovacion [PID2019-107844 GB-C22]
  8. Junta de Andalucia [P18-FR-5057]
  9. Operativo FEDER Andalucia 2014-2020 [UHU-1264517, PAIDI FQM-370]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the exact eigenenergies of T-4c, T-4b, and T-2[bc] tetraquarks were calculated using the extended transitional Hamiltonian approach. The results indicate that the rotation and vibration transitional theory provides a better description of heavy tetraquarks. A comparison with the current literature was also performed.
The exact eigenenergies of the T-4c = [cc][(c) over bar(c) over bar], T-4b = [bb][(b) over bar(b) over bar], and T-2[bc] = [bc] [(b) over bar(c) over bar] tetraquarks are calculated within the extended transitional Hamiltonian approach, in which the so-called Bethe ansatz within an infmite-dimensional Lie algebra is used. We fit the parameters appearing in the transitional region from phenomenology associated with potential candidates of tetraquarks. The rotation and vibration transitional theory seems to provide a better description of heavy tetraquarks than other attempts within the same formalism. Our results indicate that the pairing strengths are large enough to provide binding; an extended comparison with the current literature is also performed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available