4.5 Article

Geometric evolution of the Horcones Inferior Glacier (Mount Aconcagua, Central Andes) during the 2002-2006 surge

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE
Volume 121, Issue 1, Pages 111-127

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015JF003522

Keywords

Horcones Inferior; glacier surge; ASTER; Central Andes; COSI-Corr

Funding

  1. French Space Agency (CNES) through the TOSCA program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Central Andes of Chile and Argentina (31-35 degrees S) contain a large number and variety of ice masses, but only two surging glaciers have been studied in this region. We analyzed the 2002-2006 surge of the Horcones Inferior Glacier, Mount Aconcagua, Argentina, based on medium spatial resolution (15-30m) satellite images and digital elevation models. During the buildup phase the glacier was stagnant, with velocities lower than 0.1m/d. In the active-phase velocities reached 14m/d and the glacier front advanced 3.1km. At the peak of the active phase (2003-2004), the area-averaged elevation change was -42m in the reservoir zone (2.53km(2)) and +30m in the receiving zone (3.31km(2)). The estimated ice flux through a cross section located at 4175meter above sea level was 10(8)m(3) during a period of 391days, a flux that suggests a mean glacier thickness at this location of similar to 90m. The depletion phase showed a recovery of the reservoir zone elevation, the down wasting of the receiving zone (-17m, 2007-2014), and a return to quiescent velocities. The short active phase, the abrupt change in the velocities, and the high level of the proglacial stream indicate a hydrological switch (Alaska type) trigger. The 2002-2006 and 1984-1990 surges of Horcones Inferior were synchronous with the surges of nearby Grande del Nevado Glacier. These events occurred after periods of positive mass balance, so we hypothesize a climate driver.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available