4.5 Article

On the energy budgets of fragmenting rockfalls and rockslides: Insights from experiments

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE
Volume 121, Issue 7, Pages 1310-1327

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2014JF003406

Keywords

rockslides; rockfalls; fragmentation; analogue material; experimental modeling; energy budget

Funding

  1. Helmholtz Graduate Research School GEOSIM
  2. German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) [FKZ03G0809A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The travel lengths of rockfalls and rockslides can be difficult to predict due to complex interactions of numerous physical processes, such as fragmentation of the rock mass and its effect on the energy dissipation through basal and internal friction. Previous studies have shown that the front of the rockslide deposits travels farther with increased fragmentation. However, little is known about the displacement of the center of mass, which is the relevant parameter for studying the energy budget, leaving open the question whether fragmentation acts as an effective sink or source of energy. Taking advantage of a newly developed rock analogue material, we perform a total of 109 experiments to study the effect of fragmentation on the displacement of the center of mass and the energy budget of experimental rockslides. To determine the degree of fragmentation, we define a characteristic fragment size from the total mass of the experimental sample and the mass of the largest fragment. The degree of fragmentation is seen to depend linearly on the aspect ratio of the experimental sample and as a power law on its cohesion. Similar to the previous studies, our results show that the travel distance of the front of the deposits increases with the degree of fragmentation. In contrast, displacement of the center of mass is reduced with the degree of fragmentation, suggesting increased energy consumption, consistent with the assumption that fragmentation acts effectively as an energy sink.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available