4.7 Article

Investigation of matrix independent calibration of oxygen in glow discharge optical emission spectrometry

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages 1223-1228

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ja00043a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spectruma Analytik GmbH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The performance of glow discharge optical emission spectrometry for matrix independent oxygen determination was investigated in this study. It was found that at a wavelength of 130nm, the emission yield of oxygen is dependent on the matrix, while at a wavelength of 777nm, oxygen has the same emission yield in different matrices. By comparing the emission yield of oxygen with that of iron, it was found that at a wavelength of 130nm, the emission yield of oxygen in FeO is most similar to that in an Al-matrix, while at a wavelength of 777nm, the emission yield of oxygen in FeO is higher than that in Cu-, Al-, and Mg-matrices.
The performance of glow discharge optical emission spectrometry for matrix independent oxygen determination was investigated using the spectral lines of atomic oxygen at 130 nm and 777 nm and standard conditions for dc discharge with a 4 mm anode (700 V, 20 mA). Using hot-pressed calibration samples of Cu-, Al- and Mg-powder mixed with their oxides, at 130 nm the dependence of the emission yield on these matrices was confirmed. However, at 777 nm oxygen has the same emission yield in these matrices. In order to compare the emission yield of oxygen with the emission yield in iron a thick 43 mu m FeO-layer was prepared and characterized by Rutherford backscattering spectrometry, X-ray diffraction and glow discharge optical emission spectrometry. At 130 nm, the emission yield of oxygen in FeO is most similar to that in an Al-matrix. At 777 nm, the calibration revealed a higher emission yield of oxygen in FeO in comparison to the common emission yield of oxygen in Cu-, Al- and Mg-matrices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available