4.7 Article

Synthesis and characterization of sulfated-lactose polyurethane hydrogels

Journal

POLYMER CHEMISTRY
Volume 13, Issue 20, Pages 2933-2940

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2py00227b

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polyurethane hydrogels are widely used in various fields due to their durability, flexibility, and biocompatibility. In this study, polyurethane-based hydrogels were prepared using polyethylene glycol and a novel lactose monomer. It was found that the swelling of the hydrogels was driven by the hydrophilicity of the lactose units. Sulfation of the lactose rings resulted in high-swelling polyelectrolyte hydrogels. Furthermore, the effects of PEG molecular weight, degree of crosslinking, and sulfation on the swelling of the hydrogels were investigated.
Polyurethanes (PUs) are widely used due to their durability, flexibility, and biocompatibility. PU hydrogels have been used in biomedical applications, tissue engineering, synthetic extracellular matrices, and drug delivery. In this research, polyurethane-based hydrogels were prepared using polyethylene glycol (PEG) and a novel lactose monomer that could be prepared in high yields. The swelling of the hydrogels was driven by the hydrophilicity of the lactose units rather than the PEG. Subsequent sulfation of the lactose rings resulted in high-swelling polyelectrolyte hydrogels. The effects of PEG molecular weight, degree of crosslinking in the hydrogel, and sulfating the carbohydrate rings on the swelling of the hydrogles were studied. The sulfated hydrogels showed excellent swelling ratios (300-2500%) despite having a minimal average degree of sulfation per lactose ring (1.03). These sugar functionalized polyurethanes successfully combine the tunability of PUs with the swelling properties of hydrogels. We expect these polymers have potential applications in enzyme stabilization and as bioactive glycopolymers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available