4.6 Article

Subregional inversion of North African dust sources

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
Volume 121, Issue 14, Pages 8549-8566

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2016JD025020

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. OSIRIS from MEDDE/INSU
  2. France-Chile ECOS project [C14U01]
  3. Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service
  4. GENCI [t2014012201, t2015012201]
  5. FONDAP [15110009]
  6. FONDECYT [1150873]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The emission of mineral dust aerosols in arid and semiarid regions is a complex process whose representation in atmospheric models remains crude, due to insufficient knowledge about the aerosol lifting process itself, the lack of global data on soil characteristics, and the impossibility for the models to resolve the fine-scale variability in the wind field that drives some of the dust events. As a result, there are large uncertainties in the total emission flux of mineral dust, its natural variability at various timescales, and the possible contribution from anthropogenic land use changes. This work aims for estimating dust emissions and reduces their uncertainty over the Sahara desert and the Arabian Peninsulathe largest dust source region of the globe. We use a data assimilation approach to constrain dust emission fluxes at a monthly resolution for 18 subregions. The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer satellite-derived aerosol optical depth is assimilated in a regional configuration of a general circulation model coupled to an aerosol model. We describe this data assimilation system and apply it for 1year, resulting in a total mineral dust emissions flux estimate of 2900Tgyr(-1) over the Sahara desert and the Arabian Peninsula for the year 2006. The analysis field of aerosol optical depth shows an improved fit relative to independent Aerosol Robotic Network measurements as compared to the model prior field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available