4.6 Review

Stop Oversampling for Class Imbalance Learning: A Review

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages 47643-47660

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3169512

Keywords

Machine learning; Training; Benchmark testing; Support vector machines; Search problems; Licenses; Image retrieval; Oversampling; SMOTE; imbalanced datasets; machine learning; Hassanat metric

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oversampling has been used to address the challenge of learning from imbalanced datasets, but it also has its downsides. The synthesized samples may not truly represent the minority class, resulting in incorrect predictions in real-world applications. This paper analyzes various oversampling methods and proposes a new evaluation system based on comparing hidden majority examples with those generated by oversampling. Experimental results show that all studied oversampling methods produce minority samples that are most likely to be majority. Given the data and methods at hand, oversampling in its current forms and methodologies is deemed unreliable and should be avoided in real-world applications.
For the last two decades, oversampling has been employed to overcome the challenge of learning from imbalanced datasets. Many approaches to solving this challenge have been offered in the literature. Oversampling, on the other hand, is a concern. That is, models trained on fictitious data may fail spectacularly when put to real-world problems. The fundamental difficulty with oversampling approaches is that, given a real-life population, the synthesized samples may not truly belong to the minority class. As a result, training a classifier on these samples while pretending they represent minority may result in incorrect predictions when the model is used in the real world. We analyzed a large number of oversampling methods in this paper and devised a new oversampling evaluation system based on hiding a number of majority examples and comparing them to those generated by the oversampling process. Based on our evaluation system, we ranked all these methods based on their incorrectly generated examples for comparison. Our experiments using more than 70 oversampling methods and nine imbalanced real-world datasets reveal that all oversampling methods studied generate minority samples that are most likely to be majority. Given data and methods in hand, we argue that oversampling in its current forms and methodologies is unreliable for learning from class imbalanced data and should be avoided in real-world applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available