4.7 Article

Measurement report: Source apportionment of carbonaceous aerosol using dual-carbon isotopes (13C and 14C) and levoglucosan in three northern Chinese cities during 2018-2019

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages 6255-6274

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-22-6255-2022

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [XDA23010302]
  2. National Research Program for Key Issues in Air Pollution Control [DQGG0105-02]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41730108, 42173082, 41773141]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2014JQ24018]
  5. Key Projects of the CAS [ZDRW-ZS-2017-6]
  6. Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province [2019JCW-20]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the characteristics and changes in carbonaceous aerosol sources in northern Chinese cities after the implementation of the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan in 2013. The results showed that coal combustion and liquid fossil fuels were the major sources of carbonaceous aerosols, with non-fossil sources also contributing. The contribution of coal combustion and liquid fossil fuels decreased in Beijing, indicating the effectiveness of air quality management. Specific measures targeting coal combustion, biomass burning, and vehicle emissions should be strengthened in the future.
To investigate the characteristics and changes in the sources of carbonaceous aerosols in northern Chinese cities after the implementation of the Action Plan for Air Pollution Prevention and Control in 2013, we collected PM2.5 samples from three representative inland cities, i.e., Beijing (BJ), Xi'an (XA), and Linfen (LF), from January 2018 to April 2019. Elemental carbon (EC), organic carbon (OC), levoglucosan, stable carbon isotope, and radiocarbon were measured in PM2.5 to quantify the sources of carbonaceous aerosol, combined with Latin hypercube sampling. The best estimate of source apportionment showed that the emissions from liquid fossil fuels contributed 29.3 +/- 12.7 %, 24.9 +/- 18.0 %, and 20.9 +/- 12.3% of the total carbon (TC) in BJ, XA, and LF, respectively, whereas coal combustion contributed 15.5 +/- 8.8 %, 20.9 +/- 18.0 %, and 42.9 +/- 19.4 %, respectively. Non-fossil sources accounted for 55 +/- 11 %, 54 +/- 10 %, and 36 +/- 14% of the TC in BJ, XA, and LF, respectively. In XA, 44.8 +/- 26.8% of non-fossil sources were attributed to biomass burning. The highest contributors to OC in LF and XA were fossil sources (74.2 +/- 9.6% and 43.2 +/- 10.8 %, respectively), whereas those in BJ were non-fossil sources (66.8 +/- 13.9 %). The main contributors to EC were fossil sources, accounting for 91.4 +/- 7.5 %, 66.8 +/- 23.8 %, and 88.4 +/- 10.8% in BJ, XA, and LF, respectively. The decline (6 %-16 %) in fossil source contributions in BJ since the implementation of the Action Plan indicates the effectiveness of air quality management. We suggest that specific measures targeted at coal combustion, biomass burning, and vehicle emissions in different cities should be strengthened in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available