4.7 Article

Gaps in network infrastructure limit our understanding of biogenic methane emissions for the United States

Journal

BIOGEOSCIENCES
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages 2507-2522

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/bg-19-2507-2022

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [EF-1029808, 2047687]
  2. University of New Hampshire's Collaborative Research Excellence (CoRE) grant
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [2047687] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding the sources and sinks of methane is crucial for predicting and mitigating climate change. The United States needs to establish a multi-scale observation network to study the flux of biogenic methane. By analyzing variables such as climate, land cover, and location, priority areas for research infrastructure can be identified.
Understanding the sources and sinks of methane (CH4) is critical to both predicting and mitigating future climate change. There are large uncertainties in the global budget of atmospheric CH4, but natural emissions are estimated to be of a similar magnitude to anthropogenic emissions. To understand CH4 flux from biogenic sources in the United States (US) of America, a multi-scale CH4 observation network focused on CH4 flux rates, processes, and scaling methods is required. This can be achieved with a network of ground-based observations that are distributed based on climatic regions and land cover. To determine the gaps in physical infrastructure for developing this network, we need to understand the landscape representativeness of the current infrastructure. We focus here on eddy covariance (EC) flux towers because they are essential for a bottom-up framework that bridges the gap between point-based chamber measurements and airborne or satellite platforms that inform policy decisions and global climate agreements. Using dissimilarity, multidimensional scaling, and cluster analysis, the US was divided into 10 clusters distributed across temperature and precipitation gradients. We evaluated dissimilarity within each cluster for research sites with active CH4 EC towers to identify gaps in existing infrastructure that limit our ability to constrain the contribution of US biogenic CH4 emissions to the global budget. Through our analysis using climate, land cover, and location variables, we identified priority areas for research infrastructure to provide a more complete understanding of the CH4 flux potential of ecosystem types across the US. Clusters corresponding to Alaska and the Rocky Mountains, which are inherently difficult to capture, are the most poorly represented, and all clusters require a greater representation of vegetation types.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available