4.5 Article

Ancient DNA reveals a southern presence of the Northeast Arctic cod during the Holocene

Journal

BIOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0021

Keywords

warm period; historical distribution; spawning distribution; feeding grounds; re-distribution; ecological interactions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Climate change has been found to affect the spawning distribution of Northeast Arctic cod. The study suggests that temperature may not be the sole driver of this distribution, and highlights the complexity of long-term ecological interactions in the marine environment.
Climate change has been implicated in an increased number of distributional shifts of marine species during the last century. Nonetheless, it is unclear whether earlier climatic fluctuations had similar impacts. We use ancient DNA to investigate the long-term spawning distribution of the Northeast Arctic cod (skrei) which performs yearly migrations from the Barents Sea towards spawning grounds along the Norwegian coast. The distribution of these spawning grounds has shifted northwards during the last century, which is thought to be associated with food availability and warming temperatures. We genetically identify skrei specimens from Ruskeneset in west Norway, an archaeological site located south of their current spawning range. Remarkably, C-14 analyses date these specimens to the late Holocene, when temperatures were warmer than present-day conditions. Our results either suggest that temperature is not the only driver influencing the spawning distribution of Atlantic cod, or could be indicative of uncertainty in palaeoclimate reconstructions in this region. Regardless, our findings highlight the utility of aDNA to reconstruct the historical distribution of economically important fish populations and reveal the complexity of long-term ecological interactions in the marine environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available