4.2 Review

Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy for Pelvic Floor Hypertonicity: A Systematic Review of Treatment Efficacy

Journal

SEXUAL MEDICINE REVIEWS
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 209-230

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2021.03.002

Keywords

Pelvic Floor; Hypertonicity; Overactivity; Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy; Physiotherapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review evaluated the efficacy of pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) for the treatment of hypertonicity of the pelvic floor (PFH). The results indicate that PFPT can improve symptoms of chronic prostatitis, chronic pelvic pain syndrome, vulvodynia, and dyspareunia, with less significant effects seen in patients with interstitial cystitis and painful bladder syndrome. However, due to the lack of high-quality studies, further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm its effectiveness.
Introduction: Hypertonicity of the pelvic floor (PFH) is a disabling condition with urological, gynecological and gastrointestinal symptoms, sexual problems and chronic pelvic pain, impacting quality of life. Pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) is a first-line intervention, yet no systematic review on the efficacy of PFPT for the treatment of PFH has been conducted. Objectives: To systematically appraise the current literature on efficacy of PFPT modalities related to PFH. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Emcare, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception until February 2020. A manual search from reference lists of included articles was performed. Ongoing trials were reviewed using clinicaltrial.gov. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective -and retrospective cohorts and case-study analyses were included. Outcome measures were pelvic floor muscle tone and function, pain reports, sexual function, pelvic floor symptom scores, quality of life and patients' perceived effect Results: The literature search resulted in 10 eligible studies including 4 RCTs, 5 prospective studies, and 1 case study published between 2000 and 2019. Most studies had a high risk of bias associated with the lack of a comparison group, insufficient sample sizes and non-standardized interventions. Six studies were of low and 4 of medium quality. All studies were narratively reviewed. Three of 4 RCTs found positive effects of PFPT compared to controls on five out of 6 outcome measures. The prospective studies found significant improvements in all outcome measures that were assessed. PFPT seems to be efficacious in patients with chronic prostatitis, chronic pelvic pain syndrome, vulvodynia, and dyspareunia. Smallest effects were seen in patients with interstitial cystitis and painful bladder syndrome. Conclusion: The findings of this systematic review suggest that PFPT can be beneficial in patients with PFH. Further high-quality RCTs should be performed to confirm the effectiveness of PFPT in the treatment of PFH. Copyright (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the International Society for Sexual Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available