4.4 Article

Lead Extraction at a Pediatric/Congenital Heart Disease Center The Importance of Patient Age at Implant

Journal

JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages 343-353

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.11.008

Keywords

congenital heart disease; defibrillators; lead extraction; pacemaker; pediatrics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) at a single pediatric/congenital heart disease (CHD) center, demonstrating that TLE can be performed successfully and safely in this setting.
OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) at a single pediatric/congenital heart disease (CHD) center. BACKGROUND Data on TLE in pediatric and CHD patients are limited. METHODS Retrospective cohort study evaluating TLE from 2008 to 2019. RESULTS A total of 113 patients underwent TLE with 162 leads removed (including 38 high-voltage leads). Median age at lead implantation was 13 years (range 0.6-61.8 years), with a median age at extraction of 21.6 years (6.4-64.3 years). Median lead age was 7.2 years (1.0-35.3 years). Successful extraction occurred in 110 (97%) patients, 159 (98%) leads. Complex extraction was needed for 120 leads; 52 (44%) using laser alone, 27 (23%) mechanical sheath alone, and 21 (18%) using both. Femoral extraction was used for 19 (16%) leads. Risk factors for complex extraction were >-2 leads extracted (odds ratio: 3.36; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-9.36; P = 0.021), lead within the right ventricle (odds ratio: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.2-6.5; P = 0.017), and a combination of younger patient age at implant and older lead age at extraction, with patients #12 years of age at implant and leads >-7 years of age having an odds ratio: of 10.1 (95% CI: 2.21-45.9; P = 0.003). Major complications occurred in 5 (4.4%) of patients, with no mortality, but a high incidence of tricuspid valve injury. CONCLUSIONS TLE can be performed successfully and safely in a pediatric and CHD center. Patient age at lead implantation, not age at extraction, is an important predictor of needing a complex extraction, with younger patients at implant and older leads at extraction having the highest risk. (J Am Coll Cardiol EP 2022;8:343-353) (c) 2022 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available