4.6 Article

Droplet jumping physics on biphilic surfaces with different nanostructures and surface orientations under various air pressure conditions

Journal

CELL REPORTS PHYSICAL SCIENCE
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.100849

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Hong Kong Research Grant Council (RGC) via Early Career Scheme (ECS) [21200819]
  2. Innovation and Technology Commission via Innovation and Technology Fund (ITF) [ITS/429/18]
  3. City University of Hong Kong (CityU) [9610411]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By optimizing the structure of a biphilic surface, the condensation performance can be improved. A experimentally verified theory of droplet jumping is reported, which can maximize the jumping height of droplets on the biphilic surface. The improved biphilic surface shows significantly enhanced heat flux and water collection efficiency.
Suffering from the adhesion of condensing water droplets, surface condensation performance is severely degraded. On a biphilic surface, condensing droplets efficiently nucleate while spontaneously being effectively removed from the surface due to the coalescence-induced droplet jumping phenomenon, significantly improving the surface condensation performance. However, it remains a challenge to appropriately tune the biphilic surface structure to maximize the droplet jumping performance and improve the condensation. Here, we report an experimentally verified droplet jumping theory that can optimize the biphilic surface structure, maximizing the droplet jumping height on the biphilic surface. Effects of surface orientation and air pressure are also investigated. The heat flux on the optimized biphilic surface can be enhanced by -43% and -139% compared with that on the superhydrophobic surface and a normal copper plate under atmospheric conditions, respectively, while that of the water collection flux can be improved by -61% and -273%, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available