4.1 Article

New Insights on Environmental Occurrence of Pathogenic Fungi Based on Metagenomic Data from Brazilian Cerrado Biome

Journal

Publisher

INST TECNOLOGIA PARANA
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4324-2022210097

Keywords

Pathogenic fungi; metagenomics; Cerrado biome

Categories

Funding

  1. Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education: National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Brasilia, Brazil
  2. Education Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel-CAPES- Brasilia, Brazil
  3. CNPq, Brasilia, Brazil [312811/2018-7]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed the abundance of pathogenic fungi in Cerrado soils using metagenomic sequences. The results showed that the fungal abundance was lower in soils under no-tillage and conventional tillage treatments compared to native soils.
Cerrado is the second largest biome in Brazil and majorly contributes to the country's grain production. Previous studies on soil metagenomics from the Cerrado revealed an outstanding microbial diversity. In this study, the abundance of pathogenic fungi was analyzed using metagenomic sequences of the Cerrado soils under native vegetation, and under agriculture with no-tillage and conventional tillage. In total, 128,627 sequences of fungi were identified, with 43,439 representing pathogenic fungi and were distributed as follows: native 17,301 (40%), no-tillage 13,780 (32%), and conventional tillage 12,358 (28%). We identified 41 pathogenic fungal species associated with human and animal infections. The data analysis revealed that the native soils had a higher relative abundance of fungal sequences, similar to pathogenic species sequences, in relation to the total eukaryotic sequences, than the conventional tillage and no-tillage treatments, which observed a reduction in fungal abundance because of anthropogenic activities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available