4.7 Article

Multifunctional properties of epoxy nanocomposites reinforced by aligned nanoscale carbon

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 94, Issue -, Pages 554-564

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.052

Keywords

Nanocomposite; Electrical conductivity; Fracture toughness; Modelling

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Discovery Grant Programme [DP140100778]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present paper compares improvements to the fracture energy and electrical conductivity of epoxy nanocomposites reinforced by one-dimensional carbon nanofibres (CNFs) or two-dimensional graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs). The focus of this investigation is on the effects of the shape, orientation and concentration (i.e. 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 wt%) of nanoscale carbon reinforcements on the property improvements. Alignment of the nano-reinforcements in the epoxy nanocomposites was achieved through the application of an alternating current (AC) electric-field before gelation and curing of the epoxy resin. Alignment of the nano-reinforcements increased the electrical conductivity and simultaneously lowered the percolation threshold necessary to forma conductive network in the nanocomposites. Nano-reinforcement alignment also increased greatly the fracture energy of the epoxy due to a higher fraction of the nano-reinforcement participating in multiple intrinsic (e.g. interfacial debonding and void growth) and extrinsic (e.g. pull-out and bridging) toughening mechanisms. A mechanistic model is presented to quantify the contributions from the different toughening mechanisms induced by CNFs and GNPs to the large improvements in fracture toughness. The model results show that one-dimensional CNFs are more effective than GNPs at increasing the intrinsic toughness of epoxy via void growth, whereas two-dimensional GNPs are more effective than CNFs at improving the extrinsic toughness via crack bridging and pull-out. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available