4.7 Article

On the links between sub-seasonal clustering of extreme precipitation and high discharge in Switzerland and Europe

Journal

HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES
Volume 26, Issue 10, Pages 2649-2669

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/hess-26-2649-2022

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swiss Science Foundation [178751]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [179876]
  3. Helmholtz Initiative and Networking Fund (Young Investigator Group COMPOUNDX) [VH-NG-1537]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

River discharge is significantly influenced by the temporal clustering of extreme precipitation events. Clustered events result in a longer and greater response in discharge compared to isolated events. The probability of exceeding the 95th discharge percentile within 5 days following extreme precipitation is up to twice as high for clustered events. The impact of clustering decreases as the time window increases, and is also affected by catchment area, streamflow regime and precipitation magnitude. Additionally, persistent periods of high discharge often coincide with temporal clusters of precipitation extremes.
River discharge is impacted by the sub-seasonal (weekly to monthly) temporal structure of precipitation. One example is the successive occurrence of extreme precipitation events over sub-seasonal timescales, referred to as temporal clustering. Its potential effects on discharge have received little attention. Here, we address this topic by analysing discharge observations following extreme precipitation events either clustered in time or occurring in isolation. We rely on two sets of precipitation and discharge data, one centred on Switzerland and the other over Europe. We identify clustered extreme precipitation events based on the previous occurrence of another extreme precipitation within a given time window. We find that clustered events are generally followed by a more prolonged discharge response with a larger amplitude. The probability of exceeding the 95th discharge percentile in 5 d following an extreme precipitation event is in particular up to twice as high for situations where another extreme precipitation event occurred in the preceding week compared to isolated extreme precipitation events. The influence of temporal clustering on discharge decreases as the clustering window increases; beyond 6-8 weeks the difference in discharge response with non-clustered events is negligible. Catchment area, streamflow regime and precipitation magnitude also modulate the response. The impact of clustering is generally smaller in snow-dominated and large catchments. Additionally, particularly persistent periods of high discharge tend to occur in conjunction with temporal clusters of precipitation extremes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available