Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and IOTA simple rules regarding malignancy rate, validity, and reliability for diagnosis of adnexal masses
Mohammad Abd Alkhalik Basha et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2021)
Validation of American College of Radiology Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Ultrasound (O-RADS US): Analysis on 1054 adnexal masses
Lan Cao et al.
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2021)
Diagnostic Accuracy of the ADNEX Model for Ovarian Cancer at the 15% Cut-Off Value: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Xiaotong Huang et al.
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY (2021)
Cancer statistics, 2020
Rebecca L. Siegel et al.
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS (2020)
O-RADS US Risk Stratification and Management System: A Consensus Guideline from the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Committee
Rochelle F. Andreotti et al.
RADIOLOGY (2020)
Validation of models to diagnose ovarian cancer in patients managed surgically or conservatively: multicentre cohort study
Ben Van Calster et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2020)
Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China
H. Chen et al.
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY (2019)
Indeterminate Adnexal Cysts at US: Prevalence and Characteristics of Ovarian Cancer
Elizabeth A. Sadowski et al.
RADIOLOGY (2018)
Risk scores to guide referral decisions for people with suspected ovarian cancer in secondary care: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis
Marie Westwood et al.
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (2018)
Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Lexicon for Ultrasound: A White Paper of the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Committee
Rochelle F. Andreotti et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY (2018)
Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods
E. M. J. Meys et al.
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY (2017)
Predicting the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses based on the Simple Rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group
Dirk Timmerman et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2016)
The new WHO classification of ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer and its clinical implications
Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein et al.
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS (2016)
Evaluating the risk of ovarian cancer before surgery using the ADNEX model: a multicentre external validation study
A. Sayasneh et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER (2016)
External validation of the IOTA ADNEX model performed by two independent gynecologic centers
Sebastian Szubert et al.
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2016)
Strategies to diagnose ovarian cancer: new evidence from phase 3 of the multicentre international IOTA study
A. Testa et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER (2014)
Evaluating the risk of ovarian cancer before surgery using the ADNEX model to differentiate between benign, borderline, early and advanced stage invasive, and secondary metastatic tumours: prospective multicentre diagnostic study
Ben Van Calster et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2014)
Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group
Dirk Timmerman et al.
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2010)
Prospective Internal Validation of Mathematical Models to Predict Malignancy in Adnexal Masses: Results from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Study
Caroline Van Holsbeke et al.
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH (2009)
Gynecologic Imaging Reporting and Data System A New Proposal for Classifying Adnexal Masses on the Basis of Sonographic Findings
Fernando Amor et al.
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE (2009)
Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer
D. Timmerman et al.
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY (2008)
Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: A multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group
D Timmerman et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2005)
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: Practical review for radiologists
SH Park et al.
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2004)
Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology
NA Obuchowski
RADIOLOGY (2003)
Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group
D Timmerman et al.
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY (2000)
Share Paper
