4.7 Article

Physical and mechanical properties of PLA composites reinforced by TiO2 grafted flax fibers

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 106, Issue -, Pages 295-304

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.103

Keywords

PLA composite; Flax fiber; TiO2 coating; Interfacial adhesion; Physico-mechanical properties; Moisture absorption

Funding

  1. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec-Nature et Technologie (FRQNT) [179740]
  2. National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [179740]
  3. Centre de Technologie Minerale et de Plasturgie (CTMP) [179740]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, modified TiO2 grafted flax fibers were used to reinforce PLA composites. The fibers were oxidized in order to improve the interfacial adhesion of the fibers to TiO2 film. The TiO2 film was created on the flax fiber by a Sol-Gel dip-coating technique. The interfacial adhesion of the fibers to the matrix was investigated qualitatively by microscopy, and quantitatively by measuring inter-laminar shear strength. Impact and tensile tests characterized the mechanical properties of the modified TiO2 grafted flax fiber reinforced composites. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) were used to reveal the thermal and thermo-mechanical behavior of the composites. The hygroscopic behaviors of the composites were determined by the water uptake assessment. The results showed statistically significant increase in adhesion bonding of the modified fibers to the matrix. The modified TiO2 grafted flax fibers increased the impact resistance of pure PLA by three times. The microscopic observations verified the modifications in the mechanical and physical properties of the composites. Moreover, the amount of water sorption decreased by 18% in the modified TiO2 grafted fiber reinforced composite. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available