4.7 Article

Fast Locally Optimal Detection of Targeted Universal Adversarial Perturbations

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIFS.2022.3169922

Keywords

Perturbation methods; Detectors; Training; Robustness; Random variables; Principal component analysis; Support vector machines; Universal adversarial perturbations; locally optimal detection; deep neural networks; image classification; adversarial machine learning

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [CCF-1527388]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a locally-optimal generalized likelihood ratio test (LO-GLRT) for detecting targeted attacks on a classifier, which involves adding a norm-bounded targeted universal adversarial perturbation (UAP) to the classifier's input. The paper analyzes and evaluates the test, finding it to be effective in detecting the attacks.
This paper proposes a locally-optimal generalized likelihood ratio test (LO-GLRT) for detecting targeted attacks on a classifier, where the attacks add a norm-bounded targeted universal adversarial perturbation (UAP) to the classifier's input. The paper includes both an analysis of the test as well as its empirical evaluation. The analysis provides an expression for the approximate lower bound of the detection probability, and the empirical evaluation shows this approximation to be similar to the actual detection probability. Since the LO-GLRT requires the score function of the input distribution, which is usually unknown in practice, we study the LO-GLRT for a learned surrogate input distribution. Specifically, we use a Gaussian distribution over the input subvectors as the surrogate distribution, for its mathematical tractability and computational efficiency. We evaluate the detector for several popular image classifiers and datasets, and compare the statistical and computational performance with the perturbation rectifying network (PRN) detector, another successful approach for detecting the UAPs. The LO-GLRT outperforms the PRN detector on both counts, with a running time at least 100 times lower than that of the PRN detector.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available