4.7 Article

Feasibility study of dissimilar joining of aluminum alloy 5052 to pure copper via thermo-compensated resistance spot welding

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 106, Issue -, Pages 235-246

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.117

Keywords

Resistance spot welding; Thermo-compensated method; Aluminum alloys; Copper; Dissimilar metal joining; Tensile shear properties

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51275342, 51405334]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20130032110004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A parametric study was used to investigate the feasibility of dissimilar Al/Cu joining by a thermo-compensated resistance spot welding process. The tensile shear properties of the joints were found to be affected by both the weld's physical properties and metallurgical factors: (1) With increasing heat input, the nugget size and indentation increased, which led to the failure mode of the joint to change from interfacial failure to pull-out mode. (2) There was a critical heat input at which the microstructure changed in the fusion zone. At normal heat input, the fusion zone consisted of a significant amount of alpha-Al solid solution and a thin transition layer (alpha-Al/theta-CuAl2 eutectic to theta-CuAl2) at the Al/Cu interface, producing a high nugget's shear strength. At high heat input, the fusion zone mainly consisted of Al-Cu intermetallic compounds (IMCs), producing a low nugget's shear strength. The fractograph revealed cleavage features in the interfacial failure mode and dimples in the pull-out mode, which implied that the crack propagated respectively in the IMC zone and the periphery of the nugget. The Al/Cu thereto-compensated resistance spot weld joints presented a tensile shear peak load comparable to that of Al/Al joints, though their ductility was deteriorated by the IMCs. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available