4.6 Article

Transketolase Serves as a Biomarker for Poor Prognosis in Human Lung Adenocarcinoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages 2584-2593

Publisher

IVYSPRING INT PUBL
DOI: 10.7150/jca.69583

Keywords

Transketolase; lung adenocarcinoma; prognosis; biomarker

Categories

Funding

  1. Basic Research Key Project from the Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [12JC1402202]
  2. Huadong Hospital, Fudan University [2019lc026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite surgical resection, a significant number of early-stage lung cancer patients still experience relapse and death. The enzyme transketolase (TKT) has been found to play a critical role in the progression and prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), and might serve as a potential biomarker for predicting recurrence after cancer resection.
Despite apparently having completed surgical resection, approximately half of resected early-stage lung cancer patients relapse and die of their disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy reduces this risk by only 5% to 8%. Thus, there is a need for better identifying the drivers of relapse, who benefits from adjuvant therapy, and novel targets in this setting. Although emerging evidence has suggested a strong link between the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) and cancer, the role of transketolase (TKT), an enzyme in the nonoxidative branch of the PPP that connects PPP and glycolysis, remains obscure in Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). In this study, TKT expression was first identified in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and then validated with our database. TKT was upregulated at protein levels in cancer compared with normal tissues (P <0.05), and high TKT expression was associated with advanced tumor stage in our cohorts. Besides, TKT inhibitor promotes tumor cell apoptosis and cell cycle blockade. Clearly, TKT plays a critical role in LUAD progression and prognosis and could be a potential biomarker for prediction of recurrence after lung cancer resection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available