4.6 Article

Sepsis and septic shock

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS DISEASE PRIMERS
Volume 2, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.45

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  2. GlaxoSmithKline
  3. Medimmune
  4. Merck
  5. US NIH
  6. US National Institute of General Medical Sciences
  7. NIH
  8. US Public Health Service
  9. Atoxbio
  10. Arsanis
  11. Asahi Kasei
  12. Ferring
  13. Cardeas
  14. Biocartis
  15. BioAegis
  16. Aridis
  17. Batelle
  18. Cyon
  19. Adrenomed

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For more than two decades, sepsis was defined as a microbial infection that produces fever (or hypothermia), tachycardia, tachypnoea and blood leukocyte changes. Sepsis is now increasingly being considered a dysregulated systemic inflammatory and immune response to microbial invasion that produces organ injury for which mortality rates are declining to 15-25%. Septic shock remains defined as sepsis with hyperlactataemia and concurrent hypotension requiring vasopressor therapy, with in-hospital mortality rates approaching 30-50%. With earlier recognition and more compliance to best practices, sepsis has become less of an immediate life-threatening disorder and more of a long-term chronic critical illness, often associated with prolonged inflammation, immune suppression, organ injury and lean tissue wasting. Furthermore, patients who survive sepsis have continuing risk of mortality after discharge, as well as long-term cognitive and functional deficits. Earlier recognition and improved implementation of best practices have reduced in-hospital mortality, but results from the use of immunomodulatory agents to date have been disappointing. Similarly, no biomarker can definitely diagnose sepsis or predict its clinical outcome. Because of its complexity, improvements in sepsis outcomes are likely to continue to be slow and incremental.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available