4.0 Article

Determination of the absolute hardness of electrolytically produced copper coatings by application of the Chicot-Lesage composite hardness model

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SERBIAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 87, Issue 7-8, Pages 899-910

Publisher

SERBIAN CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.2298/JSC211014105M

Keywords

electrodeposition; the pulsating current; topography; hardness; relative indentation depth

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [451-03-9//2021-14/200026, 451-03-9/2021-14/200135]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel procedure based on the Chicot-Lesage composite hardness model was proposed to determine the absolute hardness of electrolytically produced copper coatings, and the obtained results were in good agreement with previous studies.
In this study, a novel procedure, based on application of the Chicot-Lesage (C-L) composite hardness model, was proposed for the determination of an absolute hardness of electrolytically produced copper coatings. The Cu coatings were electrodeposited on the Si(111) substrate by the pulsating current (PC) regime with a variation of the following parameters: the pause duration, the current density amplitude and the coating thickness. The topography of produced coatings was characterized by atomic force microscope (AFM), while a hardness of the coatings was examined by Vickers microindentation test. Applying the C-L model, the critical relative indentation depth (RID)(c) of 0.14 was determined, which is independent of all examined parameters of the PC regime. This RID value separated the area in which the composite hardness of the Cu coating corresponded to its absolute hardness (RID < 0.14) from the area in which the application of the C-L model was necessary for a determination of the absolute coating hardness (RID >= 0.14). The obtained value was in a good agreement with the value already published in the literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available