4.6 Article

Cost-effectiveness of population-wide genomic screening for Lynch syndrome in the United States

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages 1017-1026

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2020.01.017

Keywords

Colorectal cancer; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Lynch syndrome; Population screening

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of population-wide genomic screening for Lynch syndrome (LS) in an unselected US population and found that LS screening may be cost-effective for younger patient populations. However, further reductions in testing costs and the inclusion of LS testing in broader screening panels are needed to achieve high cost-effectiveness.
Purpose: Genomic screening for Lynch syndrome (LS) could prevent colorectal cancer (CRC) by identifying high-risk patients and instituting intensive CRC screening. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of a population-wide LS genomic screening vs family history-based screening alone in an unselected US population. Methods: We developed a decision-analytic Markov model including health states for precancer, stage-specific CRC, and death and assumed an inexpensive test cost of $200. We conducted sensitivity and threshold analyses to evaluate model uncertainty. Results: Screening unselected 30-year-olds for LS variants resulted in 48 (95% credible range [CR] = 35-63) fewer overall CRC cases per 100,000 screened individuals, leading to 187 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs; 95% CR = 123-260) gained at an incremental cost of $24.6 million (95% CR = $20.3 million-$29.1 million). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $132,200, with an 8% and 71% probability of being cost-effective at $100,000 and $150,000 per QALY willingness-to-pay thresholds, respectively. Conclusion: Population LS screening may be cost-effective in younger patient populations under a $150,000 willingness-to-pay per QALY threshold and with a relatively inexpensive test cost. Further reductions in testing costs and/or the inclusion of LS testing within a broader multiplex screening panel are needed for screening to become highly cost-effective. (C) 2022 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available