4.7 Article

DNA Shape Features Improve Transcription Factor Binding Site Predictions In Vivo

Journal

CELL SYSTEMS
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages 278-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.07.001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Genome Canada Large scale Applied Research Grant [174CDE]
  2. Child and Family Research Institute, Vancouver
  3. British Columbia Children's Hospital Foundation
  4. Norwegian Research Council
  5. Helse Sor-Ost
  6. University of Oslo through the Centre for Molecular Medicine Norway (NCMM), Nordic European Molecular Biology Laboratory partnership for Molecular Medicine
  7. NIH [R01GM106056, U01GM103804]
  8. Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship
  9. National Science Foundation [MCB-1413539]
  10. Direct For Biological Sciences
  11. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1413539] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interactions of transcription factors (TFs) with DNA comprise a complex interplay between base-specific amino acid contacts and readout of DNA structure. Recent studies have highlighted the complementarity of DNA sequence and shape in modeling TF binding in vitro. Here, we have provided a comprehensive evaluation of in vivo datasets to assess the predictive power obtained by augmenting various DNA sequence-based models of TF binding sites (TFBSs) with DNA shape features (helix twist, minor groove width, propeller twist, and roll). Results from 400 human ChIP-seq datasets for 76 TFs show that combining DNA shape features with position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM) scores improves TFBS predictions. Improvement has also been observed using TF flexible models and a machine-learning approach using a binary encoding of nucleotides in lieu of PSSMs. Incorporating DNA shape information is most beneficial for E2F and MADS-domain TF families. Our findings indicate that incorporating DNA sequence and shape information benefits the modeling of TF binding under complex in vivo conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available