4.7 Article

Towards practical quantum metrology with photon counting

Journal

NPJ QUANTUM INFORMATION
Volume 2, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/npjqi.2016.23

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC
  2. ERC
  3. NSQI
  4. NRF (SG)
  5. MOE (SG)
  6. ARC CQC2T
  7. Leverhulme Trust
  8. University of Bristol
  9. National Young 1000 Talents Plan
  10. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong [2016A030312012]
  11. Benjamin Meaker Visiting Fellowship
  12. ARC Future Fellowship
  13. Royal Society
  14. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J017175/1, EP/K021931/1, EP/L024020/1, EP/M024385/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  15. EPSRC [EP/L024020/1, EP/M024385/1, EP/J017175/1, EP/K021931/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantum metrology aims to realise new sensors operating at the ultimate limit of precision measurement. However, optical loss, the complexity of proposed metrology schemes and interferometric instability each prevent the realisation of practical quantum-enhanced sensors. To obtain a quantum advantage in interferometry using these capabilities, new schemes are required that tolerate realistic device loss and sample absorption. We show that loss-tolerant quantum metrology is achievable with photon-counting measurements of the generalised multi-photon singlet state, which is readily generated from spontaneous parametric downconversion without any further state engineering. The power of this scheme comes from coherent superpositions, which give rise to rapidly oscillating interference fringes that persist in realistic levels of loss. We have demonstrated the key enabling principles through the four-photon coincidence detection of outcomes that are dominated by the four-photon singlet term of the four-mode downconversion state. Combining state-of-the-art quantum photonics will enable a quantum advantage to be achieved without using post-selection and without any further changes to the approach studied here.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available