4.6 Article

Coupling of electronic and structural degrees of freedom in vanadate superlattices

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 105, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.165117

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG) within the SFB/TRR 80 [107745057, G1, G3]
  2. Center for Computational Sciences and Simulation of the University of Duisburg-Essen (DFG) [INST 20876/209-1 FUGG, INST 20876/243-1 FUGG]
  3. European Union [823717 -ESTEEM3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigates the relationship between crystal and electronic structure in YVO3-LaAlO3 superlattices using ab initio theory, scanning transmission electron microscopy, and x-ray diffraction, demonstrating how to reliably engineer orbital polarization.
Heterostructuring provides different ways to manipulate the orbital degrees of freedom and to tailor orbital occupations in transition-metal oxides. However, the reliable prediction of these modifications remains a challenge. Here we present a detailed investigation of the relationship between the crystal and electronic structure in YVO3-LaAlO3 superlattices by combining ab initio theory, scanning transmission electron microscopy, and x-ray diffraction. Density functional theory simulations including an on-site Coulomb repulsion term accurately predict the crystal structure and, in conjunction with x-ray diffraction, provide an explanation for the lifting of degeneracy of the vanadium dxz and dyz orbitals that was recently observed in this system. In addition, we unravel the combined effects of electronic confinement and octahedral connectivity by disentangling their impact from that of epitaxial strain. Our results demonstrate that the specific orientation of the substrate and the thickness of the YVO3 slabs in the multilayer can be utilized to reliably engineer orbital polarization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available