4.7 Article

Decay Incidence and Quality Changes of Film Packaged 'Simeto' Mandarins Treated with Sodium Bicarbonate

Journal

HORTICULTURAE
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae8050354

Keywords

cold storage; citrus fruit; packaging; modified atmosphere; fruit quality; shelf-life

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that packaging citrus fruit treated with 2% SBC using film packaging can effectively reduce the phytotoxicity of SBC and prolong the post-harvest life of the fruit while controlling post-harvest diseases.
Not rinsing sodium bicarbonate (SBC) treated fruit with freshwater can reduce post-harvest decay, but it can also be phytotoxic to peel tissues. Film packaging delays the ageing of peel, due to the high in-package humidity, but this also stimulates the growth of pathogens. Thus, as stand-alone treatments, both SBC and film packaging present advantages, but also drawbacks. In this study, SBC phytotoxicity was effectively mitigated when 'Simeto' mandarins, subjected to a 2 min dip treatment in a 2% SBC solution, were packaged using Omni film (highly permeable to water vapor and gases) or Coralife SWAF 400 film (with a low permeability to water vapor, but moderately permeable to gases). In particular, the combination Coralife SWAF 400 film allowed the fruit to be stored for 7 d at 5 degrees C, or 14 d at 20 degrees C, with negligible changes in overall appearance, almost no loss caused by decay, and an average weight loss of 1.3%. The in-package air composition, similar to air in Omni packages, and with an average between 5 kPa CO2 and 16 kPa O-2 in Coralife SWAF 400 packages, slightly affected the sensory and chemical qualities. Combining SBC with film packaging is a feasible method to prolong the post-harvest life of citrus fruit, and control post-harvest diseases, while avoiding the use of synthetic fungicides.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available